Micronutrient disorders are, perhaps, the most common fertility
problem in soilless media floriculture crop production. Micronutrients
(from the Greek Micro = small and nutrient = nutritive) are mineral
elements needed by plants in small quantities. Even small variations
from the optimum level required for plant growth can be damaging. By
the same token, levels slightly above the required for good growth can
be toxic. It is very important for growers to have a clear
understanding about micronutrient management. This fact sheet is a
brief overview of the principles that control the availability of
micronutrients in soilless mixes and how to correct imbalances.
A micronutrient disorder may be a deficiency (when the micronutrient
is in deficit) or a toxicity (when the micronutrient is in excess).
Deficiencies can occur either because the nutrients are not present in
the growing mix or because the nutrient is present but unavailable to
the plant. (Occasionally, plants with roots damaged by Pythium or
other pathogens may show micronutrient deficiency symptoms.) Some
commercially prepared mixes have a fertilizer charger that may include
micronutrients. Growers preparing their own mixes should use one of
the many commercially available micronutrient complexes to ensure that
the micronutrients are present in the growing mix.
| Table 1. General minimum and maximum critical foliar levels for floral crops. (After J. Biernbaum, Water, growing media, fertilizer, and root zone management. OFA Short Course, July 1994.)
|
| Nutrient | Minimum ppm | Maximum ppm
|
| Iron (Fe) | 50 | ?
|
| Manganese (Mn) | 30 | 500
|
| Zinc (Zn) | 20 | 100-200
|
| Copper (Cu) | 5 | 20-100
|
| Boron (Bo) | 25 | 100-300
|
| Molybdenum (Mo) | 0.5 | 15
|
Sometimes, the micronutrient present in a growing mix is not available
to the plant (the plant cannot take it up). Micronutrient availability
is influenced by media pH: except for molybdenum, the availability
decreases with increasing media pH and vice versa. Magnesium, a
secondary macronutrient, behaves as molybdenum in reference to pH.
Water alkalinity is an important factor modifying media pH and hence
micronutrient availability. It is important to maintain the pH for
soilless media between 5.5 and 6.3. Some crops are more sensitive to
media pH than others: hanging petunias and gerberas must be maintained
at pH levels of 5.5 in order to avoid micronutrient deficiency
symptoms. Other crops are more tolerant to pH changes. Table 1 shows
the minimum and maximum levels.
If the deficiency is due to pH imbalance, the approach is to modify
the pH of the mix. In this case, adding micronutrients can make
matters worse because the level of individual micronutrients may
affect the level in the plant of other micronutrients through a
process called antagonism. For example, too much iron may produce
manganese and zinc deficiencies, while high levels of manganese may
result in iron and zinc deficiencies. Copper and zinc are also
antagonistic: too much of one may produce deficiency of the other
(Table 2).
| Table 2. Availability of micronutrients as affected by other micronutrients (antagonism) and macronutrients in soilless mixes.
|
| Element | Availability reduced by: |
| Boron | Organic nitrogenous fertilizers and high levels of phosphorus.
|
| Manganese | High levels of potassium, phosphorus, iron, copper, and zinc.
|
| Copper | High levels of zinc, nitrogen, and phosphorus.
|
| Iron | High levels of copper, manganese, zinc, and phosphorus.
|
| Molybdenum | High levels of manganese and nitrate-nitrogen fertilizer.
|
| Zinc | High levels of copper and phosphorus.
|
On the other hand, toxicity can occur when micronutrients are applied
in excess (usually more than one application). Common sources of
micronutrients are: the charger in the mix, the irrigation water, and
fertilizers applied during the crop cycle. Growers MUST have an idea
of how much micronutrient they are adding through each of these
sources in order to avoid toxicities. Toxicity symptoms are difficult
to recognize visually (only someone with much experience can do it)
and are usually mistaken by deficiency symptoms by growers.
How do we resolve these problems? First of all, only a correct
diagnosis of the problem will lead to the proper solution. Do you have
a micronutrient deficiency or is it an excess? Identify the
micronutrient causing the problem. Identify the cause of the problem:
is the nutrient not present or is it present but unavailable?
Answering these questions will help you (and your Extension agent or
consultant) tackle the problem.
| Table 3. Sources, rates, and micronutrient concentration for continuous soil application of one or more micronutrients with every liquid fertilization. (After D. A. Bailey and P. V. Nelson, Managing micronutrients in the greenhouse. NCSU Extension, Leaflet No. 553, 1991.)
|
| Micronutrient source | Weight of source per 100 gal (oz) | Concentration (ppm) |
| Iron sulfate--20% iron | 0.13 | 2.00 Iron
|
| Iron chelate (EDTA)--12% iron | 0.22 | 2.00 Iron
|
| Manganese sulfate--28% manganese | 0.012 | 0.25 Manganese
|
| Zinc sulfate--36% zinc | 0.0018 | 0.05 Zinc
|
| Copper sulfate--25% copper | 0.0027 | 0.05 Copper
|
| Borax--11% boron | 0.030 | 0.25 Boron
|
| Sodium molybdate--38% molybdenum | 0.00035 | 0.01 Molybdenum
|
| Ammonium molybdate--54% molybdenum | 0.00025 | 0.01 Molybdenum
|
If deficiency or toxicity is suspected, soil and foliar analysis are
recommended for several reasons. First, visual identification of the
problem is difficult in the absence of information (made available
through analysis). Second, damage may be occurring that is not yet
visible and by the time it becomes visible, the damage may be
irreversible.
Deficiencies can be corrected by adding the micronutrient that is in
deficit or by correcting the factor that makes it unavailable (e.g.,
high pH). This second course of action is very common among growers
who have high alkalinity irrigation water. If only one micronutrient
is deficient, DO NOT apply a micronutrient complex fertilizer because,
as mentioned above, imbalances can cause antagonism. Apply a salt that
contains only the deficient micronutrient. Micronutrients can be:
1) added over time in small amounts with the irrigation water
(Table 3);
2) applied once with a concentrated solution during a normal
watering (Table 4);
3) applied as a single foliar spray (Table 5).
| Table 4. Sources, rates, and micronutrient concentrations for a single corrective application of one or more micronutrients applied to the soil.* (After D. A. Bailey and P. V. Nelson, Managing micronutrients in the greenhouse. NCSU Extension, Leaflet No. 553, 1991.)
|
| Micronutrient source | Weight of source per 100 gal (oz) | Concentration (ppm) |
| Iron sulfate--20% iron | 4.0 | 62.0 Iron
|
| Iron chelate (EDTA)--12% iron | 4.0 | 36.4 Iron
|
| Manganese sulfate--28% manganese | 0.5 | 10.0 Manganese
|
| Zinc sulfate--36% zinc | 0.5 | 13.9 Zinc
|
| Copper sulfate--25% copper | 0.5 | 9.3 Copper
|
| Borax--11% boron | 0.75 | 6.25 Boron
|
| For soil-based media (>20% soil in media)
|
| Sodium molybdate--38% molybdenum | 0.027 | 0.77 Molybdenum
|
| Ammonium molybdate--54% molybdenum | 0.019 | 0.77 Molybdenum
|
| For soilless media
|
| Sodium molybdate--38% molybdenum | 2.7 | 77 Molybdenum
|
| Ammonium molybdate--54% molybdenum | 1.9 | 77 Molybdenum
|
|
* Do not apply combinations without first testing on a small number of plants. Wash solution off foliage after application.
|
Toxicities are not easily corrected. The first step is to stop adding
the micronutrient that is in excess (switching to a fertilizer without
the nutrient causing the problem). Slightly changing (raising, for
most micronutrients) the media pH will decrease the availability of
all micronutrients (including the one in excess). Growers trying to
correct a micronutrient excess should raise the pH at the maximum
level that the species/cultivar can tolerate for normal growth.
Lastly, use antagonism as a tool: slightly increase the level of a
micronutrient that will reduce the availability of another (e.g., if
zinc is at high levels, slightly increase the level of copper).
Micronutrient management is complex and difficult. A more complete
treatment of this subject would require more space than available
here. This description of the problem should pique your curiosity. At
the very least, you should follow this advice: Don't guess. Test!
| Table 5. Sources, rates, and micronutrient concentration for single foliar sprays for correcting micronutrient deficiencies.* (After D. A. Bailey and P. V. Nelson, Managing micronutrients in the greenhouse. NCSU Extension, Leaflet No. 553, 1991.)
|
| Micronutrient source | Weight of source per 100 gal (oz) | Concentration (ppm) |
| Iron sulfate | 4.0 | 62.0 Iron
|
| Manganese sulfate | 2.0 | 40.0 Manganese
|
| Zinc sulfate | 2.0 | 56.0 Zinc
|
| Tri basic copper sulfate (53% Cu) | 4.0 | 159.0 Copper
|
| Sodium molybdate | 2.0 | 57.0 Molybdenum
|
| Ammonium molybdate | 2.0 | 81.0 Molybdenum
|
| * Do not apply combinations without first testing on a small number of plants.
|
NOTE: Disclaimer - This publication may contain pesticide
recommendations that are subject to change at any time. These
recommendations are provided only as a guide. It is always the
pesticide applicator's responsibility, by law, to read and follow all
current label directions for the specific pesticide being used. Due
to constantly changing labels and product registrations, some of the
recommendations given in this writing may no longer be legal by the
time you read them. If any information in these recommendations
disagrees with the label, the recommendation must be disregarded. No
endorsement is intended for products mentioned, nor is criticism
meant for products not mentioned. The author and Ohio State
University Extension assume no liability resulting from the use of
these recommendations.
-----------------
All educational programs conducted by Ohio State University Extension
are available to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard
to race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation, national origin,
gender, age, disability or Vietnam-era veteran status.
Keith L. Smith, Associate Vice President for Ag. Adm. and
Director, OSU Extension.
TDD No. 800-589-8292 (Ohio only) or 614-292-1868
|